Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hill v Repatriation Commission [2004] FCA 832 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal from administrative authorities – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Decision under Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – 'incapacity for work' – 'work' – Partial or total incapacity – Whether Tribunal recognised distinction between capacity to work and routine activities – Whether any residual capacity for work was an 'odd lot' ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Appeal from administrative authorities – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Obligation to give reasons for decision pursuant to s 43(2B) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – Consideration of content of obligation – Whether Tribunal's reasons sufficiently expose Tribunal's process of reasoning Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(2B) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 37, 37AA, 120 Veterans' Entitlements (Income Support Supplement – Permanent Incapacity for Work) Determination 1999 Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 cited Asioty v Canberra Abattoir Pty Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 533 cited Australian National Railways Commission v Collector of Customs (SA) (1985) 69 ALR 367 cited Australian Postal Corporation v Lucas (1991) 33 FCR 101 cited Ball v William Hunt & Sons Ltd [1912] AC 496 cited Bavcevic v The Commonwealth (1957) 98 CLR 296 cited Cardiff Corporation v Hall [1911] 1 KB 1009 cited Collector of Customs (Tas) v Flinders Island Community Association (1985) 7 FCR 207 cited Comcare Australia v Lees (1997) 151 ALR 647 cited Commonwealth v Borg (1991) 20 AAR 299 applied Davis v Comcare Australia [2004] FCA 182 cited Dornan v Riordan (1990) 95 ALR 451 cited Fletcher v Douglas [1934] WCR 88 cited Foster v Wharncliffe Woodmore Colliery Co Pty Ltd [1922] 2 KB 701 cited Fry v Repatriation Commission (1997) 47 ALD 776 cited Hamiltons Ewell Vineyards Pty Ltd v Holmes (1985) 38 SASR 153 cited Hawkins v Comcare (2001) 115 FCR 127 cited Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 75 ALJR 1105 cited Preston v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2004] FCA 300 cited Repatriation Commission v Hendy [2002] FCAFC 424 cited Ruiz v Canberra Rex Hotel Pty Ltd (1974) 5 ACTR 1 cited Schulz v B.H.P. Co Ltd [1934] WCR 389 cited Thompson v Armstrong & Royse Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 585 cited Tok Carpentry and Partitioning Pty Ltd v Watts (1993) 113 FLR 368 cited Vetter v Lake Macquarie City Council (2001) 202 CLR 439 cited Wemyss Coal Co Ltd v Walker (1929) 22 BWCC 366 cited Wicks v Union Steamship Co of New Zealand (1933) 50 CLR 328 cited Woden Valley Glass v Psaila (1993) 44 FCR 140 cited COLIN DENNIS HILL v REPATRIATION COMMISSION D 2 OF 2004 MANSFIELD J 1 JULY 2004 DARWIN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate