Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall, in the matter of Maxwell-Smith [2004] FCA 840
BANKRUPTCY – application for annulment of sequestration orders – bankrupt's non-attendance at hearing when sequestration order was made – facts not known to person making the sequestration order – denial of procedural fairness – sequestration order ought not to have been made – applicants may have been solvent at the time sequestration order was made – sequestration order annulled
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 153A, 153B, 154(1)(b) Bankruptcy Rules r 11(2)
Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee [2003] FCAFC 143 referred to Hardaker v Phair trading as Proctor Phair & Associates, in the matter of Hardaker [2002] FCA 1176 referred to Maxwell-Smith v S & E Hall Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 953 referred to Miller v Bondi Securities [1994] FCA 654 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SCAR (2003) 198 ALR 293; [2003] FCAFC 126 referred to Official Trustee; In the matter of the Estate of Smith [1999] FCA 1755 cited Re Anasis; Ex parte Total Australia Ltd (1985) 11 FCR 127 referred to Re Coyle (1993) 42 FCR 72 cited Re Dennehy; Ex parte Dennehy (1895) 16 LR(NSW) (Bank & Pro) 40 cited Re Ditford; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 FCR 347 cited Re Finn; Ex parte Amoco Australia Ltd and Official Receiver in Bankruptcy (1982) 41 ALR 487 cited Re Gollan; Ex parte Gollan (1992) 40 FCR 38 applied Re Williams (1968) 13 FLR 10 cited Stankiewicz v Plata [2000] FCA 1185 discussed Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323 referred to EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH AND INGE MAXWELL-SMITH v S & E HALL PTY LTD IN THE MATTER OF EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH AND INGE MAXWELL-SMITH N 198 OF 2004 MOORE J 2 JULY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate