Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Limited v Kenna Investments Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 843 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – power of review of decision of accreditation body to vary accreditation period – point of time to which Tribunal is to address itself – Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) – Accreditation Grant Principles 1999 AGED CARE – review by Administrative Appeals Tribunal of decision to vary accreditation period – point of time to which Tribunal is to address itself – relevance of factual material remote in time from decision under review – Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) – Accreditation Grant Principles 1999 Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) Chapter 4, Chapter 5, s 96‑1, s 54‑1 Accreditation Grant Principles 1999 s 3.22, s 3.24 Australian Broadcasting Commission Staff Association v Bonner (1984) 2 FCR 561 cited Commissioner of Taxation v McMahon (1997) 79 FCR 127 cited Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 cited Freeman v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1988) 19 FCR 342 cited Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2001] FCA 817 referred to Seventh Mingcourt Pty Ltd v Lawrence (1996) 64 FCR 367 cited The Hospital Benefit Fund of Western Australia Inc v Minister for Health, Housing and Community Services (1992) 39 FCR 225 cited AGED CARE STANDARDS AND ACCREDITATION AGENCY LIMITED v KENNA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD and HONOURABLE R N J PURVIS QC N 376 of 2004 BRANSON J 1 JULY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 376 of 2004
BETWEEN: AGED CARE STANDARDS AND ACCREDITATION AGENCY LIMITED
APPLICANT
AND: KENNA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
HONOURABLE R N J PURVIS QC
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate