Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicants A104 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 876
MIGRATION – procedural fairness – content of procedural fairness – obligation to put adverse findings to applicant – relocation within India – application for judicial review of decision affirming refusal to grant applicants protection visa – where Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) made finding that applicants' witnesses corroborated applicants' evidence because applicants had supplied them with false information – where RRT failed to give applicants or witnesses an opportunity to comment – whether any practical injustice suffered by applicants in light of finding by RRT that relocation possible.
Abebe v The Commonwealth of Australia [1999] HCA 14 cited Kalala v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 114 FCR 212 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6 applied APPLICANTS A104 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS; MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL; PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL S 679 of 2003 LANDER J 7 JULY 2004 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 679 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANTS A104 OF 2003
APPLICANTS
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for judicial review is dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate