Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
United States of America v Griffiths [2004] FCA 879 EXTRADITION – double criminality test – indictments for conspiracy to breach copyright and aiding and abetting breach of copyright in the United States of America EXTRADITION – duly authenticated statement in writing – sufficiency of written statement and supporting documents Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 35 & 132 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 11.2 – 11.5 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 10, 16, 19, 21, 22, Treaty on Extradition Between Australia and the United States of America Art 1(4) Extradition (United States of America) Regulations reg 4 Cabal v United Mexican States (2002) 186 ALR 188 referred to De Bruyn v Republic of South Africa (1999) 96 FCR 290 referred to Director of Public Prosecutions v Doot [1973] AC 807 referred to Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 referred to Dutton v O'Shane (2003) 200 ALR 710 applied Gerakiteys v The Queen (1983-84) 153 CLR 317 referred to Liangsiriprasert v United States [1991] 1 AC 225 referred to Linhart v Elms (1988) 81 ALR 557 applied Lipohar v The Queen (1999-2000) 200 CLR 485 referred to McDade v United Kingdom [1999] FCA 1868 referred to Regina v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte [2000] 1 AC 61 referred to Regina v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate; Ex parte Government of USA [2000] 2 AC 216 referred to Republic of South Africa v Dutton (1997) 77 FCR 128 referred to Riley v The Commonwealth (1985) 159 CLR 1 referred to Schoenmakers v Director of Public Prosecutions (1991) 108 FLR 457 referred to The State (Furlong) v Kelly [1971] IR 132 referred to Todhunter v United States of America (1995) 57 FCR 70 referred to Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 23 FCR 472 referred to Zoeller v Republic of Germany (1989) 23 FCR 282 referred to J Lahore & WA Rothnie, Copyrights and Designs Butterworths Australia, 2003, (Looseleaf edn) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v HEW RAYMOND GRIFFITHS AND DANIEL REISS N 503 of 2004 JACOBSON J 7 JULY 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate