Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hassan v Hume [2004] FCA 886
HUMAN RIGHTS - discrimination and victimisation – universities – doctoral student enrolled at University of New South Wales – enrolment and scholarship cancelled for non-disclosure in application – information of previous enrolment and disciplinary proceedings provided by University of Adelaide – prior complaint to Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission against University of Adelaide – complaint to Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission about cancellation of enrolment and scholarship by University of New South Wales and provision of information by University of Adelaide – general allegation of discrimination and victimisation – complaint terminated – application to Federal Magistrates Court – application dismissed summarily – no reasonable cause of action – appeal to Federal Court – appeal dismissed – no issue of principle Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) s 17, s 27 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PH, s 46PO Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1A) Federal Magistrates Court Rules r 13.7, r 13.10 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 cited GHALI HASSAN v PROFESSOR ROY HUME AND ANOTHER W 247 OF 2003 FRENCH J 7 JULY 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W247 OF 2003
On Appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
BETWEEN: GHALI HASSAN
APPELLANT
AND: PROFESSOR RORY HUME (University of NSW)
FIRST RESPONDENT
PROFESSOR JAMES McWHA (University of Adelaide)
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate