Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman License Holdings Ltd [2004] FCA 934 Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 (Cth) ss 6 and 7
UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, FESTIVAL RECORDS PTY LTD AND MUSHROOM RECORDS PTY LTD TRADING AS FESTIVAL MUSHROOM RECORDS, EMI MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED, WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED, BMG AUSTRALIA LIMITED v SHARMAN LICENSE HOLDINGS LTD, SHARMAN NETWORKS LTD, LEF INTERACTIVE PTY LTD, NICOLA ANNE HEMMING, PHIL MORLE, ALTNET INC, BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT INC, BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT PTY LTD, KEVIN GLEN BERMEISTER, ANTHONY ROSE N 110 of 2004 WILCOX J 1 JULY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 110 of 2004
BETWEEN: UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
FIRST APPLICANT
FESTIVAL RECORDS PTY LTD AND MUSHROOM RECORDS PTY LTD TRADING AS FESTIVAL MUSHROOM RECORDS
SECOND APPLICANT
EMI MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
THIRD APPLICANT
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
FOURTH APPLICANT
WARNER MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
FIFTH APPLICANT
BMG AUSTRALIA LIMITED
SIXTH APPLICANT
AND: SHARMAN LICENSE HOLDINGS LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
SHARMAN NETWORKS LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
LEF INTERACTIVE PTY LTD
THIRD RESPONDENT
NICOLA ANNE HEMMING
FOURTH RESPONDENT
PHIL MORLE
FIFTH RESPONDENT
ALTNET INC
SIXTH RESPONDENT
BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT INC
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate