Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Thomas v State of South Australia [2004] FCA 951 NATIVE TITLE – application to strike out native title claim under s 84C Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – principles applicable on strike out application for lack of authorisation under s 251B(a) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 61, 84C, 251B Williams v Grant [2004] FCAFC 178 applied Grant v Minister for Land & Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [2003] FCA 621 cited Quall v Risk [2001] FCA 378 cited Moran v Minister for Land and Water Conservation for NSW [1999] FCA 1637 cited Edward Landers v State of South Australia [2003] FCA 264 cited Wharton on behalf of the Kooma People v State of Queensland [2003] FCA 790 cited Wharton on behalf of the Kooma People v State of Queensland [2003] FCA 1398 cited Branfield v Wharton [2004] FCAFC 138 cited Wilkes v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1140 cited Bodney v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 890 cited Booth v The State of Queensland [2003] FCA 418 cited Simms v Minister for Land & Water Conservation [2002] 193 ALR 257 cited Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 applied Johnson, in the matter of Lawson v Lawson [2001] FCA 894 cited Daniel v State of Western Australia (2003) 194 ALR 278; [2002] FCA 1147 cited ROGER JAMES THOMAS & DANIEL ERNEST CLIFTON ON BEHALF OF THE KOKATHA PEOPLE v STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA & OTHERS SG 6013 of 1998 MANSFIELD J 22 JULY 2004 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 6013 OF 1998
BETWEEN: ROGER JAMES THOMAS & DANIEL ERNEST CLIFTON ON BEHALF OF THE KOKATHA PEOPLE
APPLICANT
AND: THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate