Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mohammed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 970 MIGRATION – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – Tribunal affirming decision to cancel applicant's student (temporary) (class TU) visa – whether Tribunal in error of law in concluding applicant breached condition 8105 – whether Tribunal asked wrong question or ignored relevant evidence – Tribunal did not ignore correspondence asserting work as part of course requirement – absence of evidence of specification of such work as course requirement – Tribunal did not ask wrong question in relation to qualification as 'work' – whether Tribunal denied procedural fairness – no contention open that Tribunal should have made inquiry – no contention open that Tribunal should have given applicant opportunity to comment upon information given by him for the purpose of the application
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 48, 116, 116(1)(b), 116(3), 359A, 359A(4), 420 Education Services for Overseas Students Act 2000 (Cth) s 10 Migration Regulations 1994 Sch 8 cl 8105, subcl 8105(1), subcl 8105(2), regs 1.03, 2.01, 2.12, 2.43(2) Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 207 ALR 12 applied SAM SUZZAMAN MOHAMMED v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W214 of 2003 SAM SUZZAMAN MOHAMMED v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W4 of 2004 RD NICHOLSON J 27 JULY 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W214 OF 2003
W4 OF 2004
BETWEEN: SAM SUZZAMAN MOHAMMED
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate