Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Goldie v The Commonwealth of Australia [2004] FCA 973
BRIAN GERALD JAMES GOLDIE v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA W61 of 2004 CARR J 23 JULY 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W61 OF 2004
BETWEEN: BRIAN GERALD JAMES GOLDIE
APPLICANT
AND: THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JEFFREY TUNBRIDGE
THIRD RESPONDENT
ANTHONY BATTAGLINI
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ROSS GREGG
FIFTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL CAIN
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JAMIE McCORMACK
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
THOMAS HOENIG
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
DONNA RIORDAN
NINTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: CARR J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first and second respondents' costs of the appeal and the motion and the costs (if any) of the other respondents to the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W61 OF 2004
BETWEEN: BRIAN GERALD JAMES GOLDIE
APPLICANT
AND: THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JEFFREY TUNBRIDGE
THIRD RESPONDENT
ANTHONY BATTAGLINI
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ROSS GREGG
FIFTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL CAIN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate