Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VCAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1005
MIGRATION – protection visas – claim based on conscientious objection to military service – Tribunal found military service law a law of general application – religious basis for conscientious objection – whether Tribunal erred in failing to consider – alternative basis for decision of Tribunal – subsequent change in circumstances – correctness of decision not affected
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 36 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth)
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476, referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 211 CLR 441, referred to Chen Shi Hai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 201 CLR 293, referred to Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 105 FCR 548, referred to Okere v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 87 FCR 112, considered Stoljkovic v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 33 ALD 379, referred to Murillo-Nunez v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 63 FCR 150, referred to Erduran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 122 FCR 150, followed Mohamed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 4, referred to Appellant S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 112, cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502, referred to VBAC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 205, referred to VEAJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 678, referred to Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd (1972) 127 CLR 421, referred to Zhang v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 45 FCR 384, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323, referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v VFAI of 2002 [2002] FCAFC 374, considered Applicant VEAZ of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1033, followed APPLICANT VCAD OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 156 of 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate