Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth v ADI Limited [2004] FCA 1011
DISCOVERY – general discovery sought by applicant – whether order for general discovery is necessary – limited discovery ordered
Federal Court Rules O 15 r 15
Reading Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd v Birch Carroll & Coyle Ltd [2002] FCAFC 109 referred to Trade Practices Commission v CC (New South Wales) Pty Limited (1995) 58 FCR 426 cited COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v ADI LIMITED ACN 008 642 751 AND PARKER ENZED TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED ACN 005 879 130 AND TODD HYDRAULIC PTY LIMITED TRADING AS "ENZED FREMANTLE" ACN 009 084 986 AND JETROCK PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) TRADING AS "THE HOSE DOCTOR" ACN 080 369 268 N 457 OF 2001 MOORE J 5 AUGUST 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 457 OF 2001
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
APPLICANT
AND: ADI LIMITED ACN 008 642 751
FIRST RESPONDENT
PARKER ENZED TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED ACN 005 879 130
SECOND RESPONDENT
TODD HYDRAULIC PTY LIMITED TRADING AS "ENZED FREMANTLE" ACN 009 084 986
THIRD RESPONDENT
JETROCK PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) TRADING AS "THE HOSE DOCTOR" ACN 080 369 268
FOURTH RESPONDENT
TODD HYDRAULIC PTY LIMITED TRADING AS "ENZED FREMANTLE" ACN 009 084 986
FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
ADI LIMITED ACN 008 642 751
CROSS-RESPONDENT IN THE FIRST CROSS-CLAIM
PARKER ENZED TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED ACN 005 879 130
SECOND CROSS-CLAIMANT
ADI LIMITED ACN 008 642 751
CROSS-RESPONDENT IN THE SECOND CROSS-CLAIM
ADI LIMITED ACN 008 642 751
THIRD CROSS-CLAIMANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate