Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wilson v Manna Hill Mining Company Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1035
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – costs – rule that costs follow the event – indemnity costs – whether conduct of second respondent warranted order for costs on an indemnity basis. WAYNE STEPHEN WILSON & ANOR v MANNA HILL MINING COMPANY PTY LTD & ORS No SAD 3004 of 2003 LANDER J 30 JULY 2004 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 3004 OF 2003
BETWEEN: WAYNE STEPHEN WILSON
FIRST APPLICANT
GAYLE LAWTON
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MANNA HILL MINING COMPANY PTY LTD
(ACN 075 590 644)
FIRST RESPONDENT
DAVID GERALD MOORE
SECOND RESPONDENT
GRAHAM DESMOND HAGGER
THIRD RESPONDENT
EAST ADELAIDE COMPANY PTY LTD (ACN 010 070 612)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
DENE ROBERT SPRATT
FIFTH RESPONDENT
STEPHEN JOHN EWEN
SIXTH RESPONDENT
HODGEMORE PTY LTD (ACN 092 397 629)
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
MANNA HILL GOLD PTY LTD (ACN 106 678 540)
EIGHTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 JULY 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The second respondent pay to the applicants their costs on an indemnity basis. 2. The fifth and sixth respondents pay to the applicants their costs on a party and party basis.
3. Mr Moore's comments in relation to Ms Lawton at page 12 and page 13 of the transcript of the directions hearing held on 30 July 2004 be suppressed from publication. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate