Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Eli Lilly & Company v Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals (No 3) [2004] FCA 1085
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patents – application to rely on experiments conducted in the United States as experimental proof – whether applicants concealed experimental evidence – whether respondents would be prejudiced if experiments could be relied on
Federal Court Rules, O 58 r 31 ELI LILLY & COMPANY & ORS V PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS & ANOR V604 OF 2002 HEEREY J 16 AUGUST 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V604 OF 2002
BETWEEN: ELI LILLY & COMPANY
FIRST APPLICANT/FIRST CROSS-RESPONDENT
ELI LILLY AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
ACN 000 233 992
SECOND APPLICANT/SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
ELI LILLY & COMPANY LIMITED
THIRD APPLICANT/THIRD CROSS-RESPONDENT
AND: PFIZER IRELAND AND PHARMACEUTICALS
FIRST RESPONDENT/FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
PFIZER PTY LIMITED ACN 008 422 348
SECOND RESPONDENT/SECOND CROSS-CLAIMANT
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 AUGUST 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave be granted to the applicants/cross-respondents to rely on affidavits in admissible form substantially in accordance with the declarations of Dr Vincent Florio and Dr Philip Iverson annexed to the notice of motion dated 10 August 2004 as evidence derived from experimental proof of a matter as evidence in this proceeding. 2. The applicants/cross-respondents pay the applicants costs of the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V604 OF 2002
BETWEEN: ELI LILLY & COMPANY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate