Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S453 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1106
MIGRATION – application for constitutional writs remitted from High Court – bridging visa – conditions prohibit working or studying – whether the conditions stipulated by the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) are beyond the powers conferred by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the conditions contrary to Australia's international obligations – whether evidence that the Minister (or the Commonwealth) breached a duty of care owed to the applicant – application for order nisi dismissed
Constitution s 75(v) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 29, 30, 37, 41 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 2.04, 2.05, Sch 2 cl 050.612A Federal Court Rules O 46 r 7A, O 51A r 5
Applicants S61 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal (2004) 206 ALR 461 cited Applicant M171/2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 220 cited Re Australian Nursing Federation; Ex parte State of Victoria (1993) 112 ALR 177 cited Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 cited Amrit Lal Narain v Parnell (1986) 9 FCR 479 referred to Applicant NAGM of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) 125 FCR 488 referred to APPLICANT S453 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 588 of 2004 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 30 AUGUST 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 588 of 2004
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S453 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate