Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S76 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1107
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – remittal from High Court of Australia – leave sought to file an amended application – whether judge of the High Court intended to remit whole justiciable controversy MIGRATION – application for order quashing decision of Refugee Review Tribunal to refuse to grant protection visa – where grounds of appeal reach only to one of the independent bases for the Tribunal's decision – whether failure of Tribunal to obtain current country information constitutes jurisdictional error
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 18 Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Applicants S61 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCAFC 150 considered Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko‑Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 distinguished Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 referred to WAGJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 277 cited APPLICANT S76 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA N 2593 of 2003 BRANSON J 26 AUGUST 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 2593 of 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S76 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 AUGUST 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for an order nisi for constitutional writs be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate