Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Perre v Apand Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1116 FRANK PERRE & ORS v APAND PTY LTD & ORS SG 28 OF 1994 SELWAY J 19 AUGUST 2004 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SG 28 OF 1994
BETWEEN: FRANK PERRE, CATERINA PERRE, PASQUALE PERRE
MARY PERRE, GUISEPPE DOMENICO PERRE,
MARIA PERRE, JIM PERRE, FRANCES PERRE,
WARRUGA FARMS PTY LTD, PERRE'S VINEYARDS PTY LTD, GRACE PERRE
FIRST TO ELEVENTH APPLICANTS
AND: RANGARA PTY LTD,
FRANCESCO PERRE, MARIA PERRE
TWELFTH TO FOURTEEN APPLICANTS
AND: APAND PTY LTD
RESPONDENT
AND: RISU NOMINEES PTY LTD, RICHARD DUNSTONE TOWNSEND, JOHN ANDREW MORCOMBE, JOHN SHEAHAN AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LEO JOHN REYNOLDS
CROSS RESPONDENTS
AND: RISU NOMINEES PTY LTD, RICHARD DUNSTONE TOWNSEND, JOHN ANDREW MORCOMBE, JOHN SHEAHAN AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LEO JOHN REYNOLDS
CROSS CLAIMANTS
AND: FRANK PERRE, CATERINA PERRE, PASQUALE PERRE, MARY PERRE, GUISEPPE DOMENICO PERRE, MARIA PERRE, JIM PERRE, FRANCES PERRE, WARRUGA FARMS PTY LTD, PERRE'S VINEYARDS PTY LTD, GRACE PERRE
FIRST TO ELEVENTH CROSS-RESPONDENTS
AND: STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND THE MINISTER FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRY
INTERVENERS
JUDGE: SELWAY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate