Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VRAW v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1133 MIGRATION – application for asylum –persecution by "rogue" state officials – police inaction – adequate state protection – test to be applied Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 AC 489 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar (2002) 210 CLR 1 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Respondents S152/2003 (2004) 78 ALJR 678 followed Osman v United Kingdom (1998) 29 EHRR 245 considered Regina v Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Shah [1999] 2 AC 629 cited Risak v Minister of Employment and Immigration (1994) 86 FTR 67 approved Svazas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] 1 WLR 1891 applied Zhuravlvev v The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [2000] 4 CF 3 cited VRAW & VRAX v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 635 of 2003 FINKELSTEIN J 3 SEPTEMBER 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 635 of 2003
BETWEEN: VRAW & VRAX
Applicants
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 SEPTEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. A writ of certiorari issue to the Refugee Review Tribunal removing into this court and quashing the decision of the Tribunal given on 20 June 2003. 2. A writ of mandamus issue to the Refugee Review Tribunal directing it to hear and determine the matter in accordance with law. 3. The respondent pay the applicants' taxed costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate