Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Braverus Maritime Inc [2004] FCA 1211 SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – compulsory pilotage – negligent navigation by pilot – liability of shipowner for damage caused by collision with berth – pilot employed by port corporation – vicarious liability of shipowner for default of pilot – pilot deemed to be shipowner's servant by s 410B of Navigation Act 1912 (Cth) and s 85 of the Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 (NSW) – shipowner vicariously liable for negligence of servant – entitlement to contribution from port corporation – no entitlement to contribution – statutory immunities operate to defeat contribution claim SHIPPING AND NAVIGATION – licensing of pilots – no valid licence issued to pilot – statutory scheme operates despite absence of licence TORT – vicarious liability – employers – employee exercising independent duties – pilot employed by port corporation but deemed by statute to be servant of shipowner – duty imposed by statute operative to exclude vicarious duty of employer TORT – contributory negligence – causation – insufficient causative link between increased risk of damage and damage ultimately suffered – no contributory negligence CONTRACT – formation – alleged existence of standing offer on the part of port corporation for provision of pilotage services – pilotage services offered pursuant to statutory obligation – no voluntary assumption of duty – no contract where duty imposed by statute – imperfect performance of statutory duty does not give rise to a contract CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – just terms – Navigation Act alleged to have effect of removing cause of action and imputing incontestable liability without provision of just terms – Navigation Act not a law with respect to the acquisition of property – in any event, no liability or cause of action had accrued at the relevant time TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct – pilot carrying out statutory function – pilotage not an activity bearing a trading or commercial character – pilotage not 'in trade or commerce' Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) s 5(1)(c) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW) s 8, 9 Marine Pilotage Licensing Act 1971 (NSW) s 3, 6, 7, 7(2)(a), 8, 12, 12(1), 14, 50A Marine Pilotage Licensing Regulations 1974 (NSW) Merchant Shipping Act 1854 (17 & 18 Vic) Merchant Shipping Act 1894 (57 & 58 Vic) s 633 Navigation Act 1912 (Cth) s 2(1)(a), 6, 410B, 410B(1), 410B(2) Navigation Act 1920 (Cth) Navigation Act 1958 (Cth) Navigation (Maritime Conventions) Act 1934 (Cth) Pilotage Act 1812 (52 Geo III) Pilotage Act 1825 (6 Geo IV) s 55 Pilotage Act 1913 (Imp) s 15, 15(1) Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 (NSW) s 3, 7, 9, 11, 53, 54(2), 67, 68, 70, 77, 78, 84(1), 85, 86 Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Regulation 1997 (NSW) Regs 10, 11 State Owned Corporations Act 1989 (NSW) s 20F, 20ZB(1) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45, 52, 74, 82, 87 Constitution s 51(i), 51(xxxi), 98, 109 International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Respecting Collisions between Vessels (signed 23 September 1910; generally in force 1 March 1913; entered into force in Australia 24 October 1930)Article 5 Canada Shipping Act 1952 Australia, House of Representatives, Debates, 22 October 1912, pp 4481-4482 Explanatory Notes on Clauses of Draft Navigation Bill 1958 (7th March 1958) A Aronson, B Dyer & M Groves Judicial Review of Administrative Action, LBC, Sydney, 3rd Ed, 2004 R P Balkin & J L R Davis, Law of Torts, Butterworths, 3rd Ed, 2004 D A Butler & W D Duncan, Maritime Law in Australia, Legal Books, Sydney, 1992 R Douglas, P Lane and M Pete, Douglas & Geen on the Law of Harbours Coasts and Pilotage, LLP, London, 5th ed, 1997 R G Marsden A Treatise on the Law of Collisions at Sea, Stevens and Sons, London,6th Ed, 1910 F Trindade & P Cane, The Law of Torts in Australia, OUP, 3rd Ed, 1999 The Nautical Institute on Pilotage and Shiphandling, The Nautical Institute, London, 1990 Amarantos Shipping Co Ltd v South Australia (2004) 87 SASR 528 cited Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1 applied Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v O'Reilly (1962) 107 CLR 46 cited Australian Tape Manufacturers Association Ltd v Commonwealth (1993) 176 CLR 480 discussed Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424 followed Branir Pty Ltd v Owsten Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 followed Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1940] AC 152 cited Chapman v Luminis (No 4) (2001) 123 FCR 62 followed Chelfco Ninety-Four Pty Ltd v Road Traffic Authority [1985] VR 1 cited Clark (or Thom) v J & P Hutchinson Ltd [1925] SC 386 cited Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 referred to Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins (2003) 77 ALJR 1706 cited Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd [1989] 1 AC 643 ('The Esso Bernicia') applied Fowles v Eastern and Australian Steamship Co Ltd (1913) 17 CLR 149 cited Fowles v Eastern and Australian Steamship Co Ltd [1916] 2 AC 556 cited Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 followed Georgiadis v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (1994) 179 CLR 297 cited Harbutt's Plasticine Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd [1970] 1 QB 447 cited Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 applied Holman v Irvine Harbour Trustees (1877) 4 Sess Cas (4th series) 406 explained Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wilth Wilhelmensen Agency Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 313 followed Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 applied Johnston v Frazer (1990) 21 NSWLR 89 applied Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608 discussed Joslyn v Berryman (2003) 77 ALJR 1233 applied Leotta v Public Transport Commission of New South Wales (1976) 9 ALR 437 referred to Lismore County Council v Stewart (1989) 18 NSWLR 718 applied Norweb PLC v Dixon [1995] 3 All ER 952 cited Oceangas (Gibraltar) Ltd v Port of London Authority [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 292 ('The Cavendish') referred to Oceanic Crest Shipping Co v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd [1986] WAR 88 discussed Oceanic Crest Shipping Co v Pilbara Harbour Services Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 626 applied Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 450 followed Otago Harbour Board v Cates (1884) 2 NZLR 123 discussed Owners of the Dredger "Liesbosh" v Owners of the Steamship "Edison" [1933] AC 449 cited Pfizer Corporation v Ministry of Health [1965] AC 512 referred to Puntoriero v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation (1999) 199 CLR 575 distinguished Purcell v Watson (1979) 26 ALR 235 followed R W Miller & Co Pty Ltd v Shortland County Council (1988) 83 ALR 225 cited Re DPP; ex parte Lawler (1994) 179 CLR 270 applied Re Maritime Union of Australia; ex parte CSL Pacific Shipping Inc (2003) 77 ALJR 1497 cited Rockhampton Harbour Board v Ocean Steamship Co Ltd [1930] QSR 343 cited Southampton Container Terminals Ltd v Hansa Schiffartsgesellschaft mbH [1999] 2 Lloyd's Rep 491 ('The Maersk Columbo') distinguished Smith v ANL Ltd (2001) 204 CLR 493 cited SS Alexander Shukoff v SS Gothlard [1921] 1 AC 244 cited Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority [2000] FCA 1381 cited Suatu Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Postal Corporation (1989) 86 ALR 532 cited Texada Mines Pty Ltd v The Ship 'Afovos' [1974] 2 Lloyd's Rep 168 cited The Andoni [1918] P 14 cited The Arum [1921] P 12 cited The Christiana (1850) 7 Moore's PC Cases 160; 13 ER 841 discussed The Eden (1846) 2 Wm Robb 442 ; 166 E.R. 822 discussed The Gazelle (1884) 2 Wm Robb 279; 166 ER 759 discussed The Guy Mannering (1882) 7 PD 132 discussed The Maria (1839) 1 Wm Robb 95; 166 ER 508 discussed The Oregon 158 US 186 (1895) cited The Peerless (1860) Lush. 30 ; 167 ER 16 cited The Prinses Juliana [1936] P 139 cited The Tactician [1907] P 244 discussed Tiwi Barge Services Pty Ltd v Stark (1997) 78 FCR 218 cited Wood v Smith (1874) LR 5 PC 451 ('The City of Cambridge') discussed Workington Harbour and Dock Board v Towerfield (Owners) [1951] AC 112 ('The Towerfield') discussed PORT KEMBLA COAL TERMINAL LTD v BRAVERUS MARITIME INC N 1397 OF 2002 HELY J 17 SEPTEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate