Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Barnes v Boulton [2004] FCA 1219 CONSTITUTION – Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – abolition of privilege against self-incrimination and grant of use immunity – whether impermissibly interferes with State courts. STATUTES – amending or abrogating the common law – one Australian common law – limited legislative competence of Commonwealth and State Parliaments to abrogate the common law – effect of abrogation by the Commonwealth Parliament STATUTES – Statutory duty to record reasons for a decision – person summoned to appear at examination under Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) – whether statute impliedly confers a right on a witness to be given the record – purpose of the statutory provision – no right to reasons under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)
Commonwealth Constitution pl 51, 106, 122 Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 4, 7A, 7C, 24A, 28, 29A, 30, 46B, 54, 55, 57, 59 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B National Crime Authority (Territory Provisions) Act 1985 Australian Crime Commission Establishment Act 2002 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 13, Schedule 2 Intelligence Services Act 2001 (Cth) Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth) Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) Foreign Evidence Act 1994 (Cth)
Mansfield v Australian Crime Commission [2003] FCA 1059 cited A v Boulton [2004] FCA 56 cited A v Boulton [2004] FCAFC 101 applied Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2001) 113 FCR 230 cited Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 cited Harper v Costigan (1983) 72 FLR 140 cited National Companies and Securities Commission v News Corporation Ltd (1984) 156 CLR 296 cited R v Young (1999) 46 NSWLR 681 cited Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (2004) 205 ALR 1 cited Re Tracey; Ex parte Ryan (1989) 166 CLR 518 considered Sorby v The Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 referred to Hamilton v Oades (1989) 166 CLR 486 cited Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 cited The Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd (1913) 17 CLR 644 cited Bercove v Hermes (No 3) (1983) 51 ALR 109 cited Ross v Costigan (1982) 41 ALR 319 cited Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 201 CLR 49 cited Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of New South Wales (1996) 189 CLR 51 cited Western Australia v The Commonwealth (1995) 183 CLR 373 cited Blunden v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 203 ALR 189 cited John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 cited Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485 applied O'Neill v Mann (2000) 101 FCR 160 cited Melbourne Corporation v The Commonwealth (1947) 74 CLR 31 referred to Re Australian Education Union; Ex parte Victoria (1995) 184 CLR 188 referred to Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth (1912) 15 CLR 182 discussed R v Reid [1999] 2 VR 605 cited Austin v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 321 referred to Campbell v Metway Leasing Ltd (2002) 126 FCR 14 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate