Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sony Entertainment (Australia) Limited v Smith [2004] FCA 1254 SONY ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED & ORS v CHRISTOPHER FRASER SMITH & ORS N 944 of 2002 JACOBSON J 21 SEPTEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 944 of 2002
BETWEEN: SONY ENTERTAINMENT (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
(ACN 000 033 581)
FIRST APPLICANT
UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
(ACN 000 158 592)
SECOND APPLICANT
CENTRAL STATION RECORDS & TAPES PTY LTD
(ACN 005 707 997)
THIRD APPLICANT
and the applicants listed on the attached schedule
AND: CHRISTOPHER FRASER SMITH
also known as CHRIS KROSS
also known as KRIS KROSS
FIRST RESPONDENT
TOWER RECORDS PTY LTD
(ACN 084 046 784)
T/A SLAMM DISTRIBUTION
SECOND RESPONDENT
PETER FERRIS
also known as PEEWEEFERRRIS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: JACOBSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 SEPTEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The motion filed on 20 September 2004 be dismissed. 2. The first, second and fifth respondents to pay the applicant's costs of the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
SCHEDULE OF ADDITIONAL APPLICANTS
SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (GERMANY) GMBH
FOURTH APPLICANT
MEDIA RECORDS SRL
FIFTH APPLICANT
COMBINED FORCES RECORDS BV
SIXTH APPLICANT
TRACID TRAXX GMBH
SEVENTH APPLICANT
DANCE STREET GMBH
EIGHTH APPLICANT
KONTOR RECORDS GMBH
NINTH APPLICANT
ALPHABET CITY GMBH
TENTH APPLICANT
NERVOUS INC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate