Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hamdan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1267 MIGRATION – unlawful non-citizen released from detention pursuant to a court order – Al-Kateb v Goodwin – telephone number confidentially communicated to legal adviser – desire to avoid detention – whether communication attracts legal professional privilege. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – unlawful non-citizen who is at large communicates telephone number to legal adviser – whether the number is a mere collateral fact not attracting privilege. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – confidential communication of telephone number to legal adviser – desire to avoid being detained under s 189 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether confidentiality sought in furtherance of an illegal purpose – no offence being committed or proposed – no obligation to facilitate own detention. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – whether confidentiality sought to frustrate processes of the Court – non-attendance at hearing at which habeas corpus application dismissed – whether any court process frustrated.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 14, 18, 21, 189, 197A Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2002) 213 CLR 543 cited Sorby v The Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 cited Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 208 ALR 124 applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Khafaji (2004) 208 ALR 201 cited Pratt Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 207 ALR 217 cited Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 applied Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 applied Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 referred to Carter v Northmore Hale Davy & Leake (1995) 183 CLR 121 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Coombes (1999) 92 FCR 240 cited Southern Cross Commodities Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Crinis [1984] VR 697 cited Ex parte Campbell; In re Cathcart (1870) LR 5 Ch App 703 applied R v Bell; Ex parte Lees (1980) 146 CLR 141 distinguished Attorney-General of the Northern Territory v Kearney (1985) 158 CLR 500 applied ABBY HAMDAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS No S 205 of 2004 FINN J ADELAIDE 1 OCTOBER 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate