Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McCrea v Minister for Customs & Justice [2004] FCA 1273
EXTRADITION — whether Minister had power to surrender applicant to Singapore — undertaking as to death penalty — whether undertaking satisfies s 22(3)(c)(iii) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) — whether s 22(3) requires an undertaking valid and effective to prevent execution — purposes of extradition law — functions of executive and judiciary in extradition — principle of non-adjudication — role of comity and expediency and nature of judicial process — protection of rights of accused — comparison between 22(3)(c) and s 22(3)(d) — "by virtue of which" — "undertaking" — "assurance" — comparative jurisprudence on the death penalty — fundamental human rights. Acts Interpretation Act 1901(Cth) Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) s 22(3), Part II Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Attorney-General (UK) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) (1988) 165 CLR 30 applied Aylor (1993) 100 ILR 665 cited Banco Nacional de Cuba v Sabbatino (1964) 376 US 398 applied Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888 applied Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 at 437 cited Fidan (1987) 100 ILR 662 cited Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice (1999) 164 ALR 357 applied Hellenic Republic v Tzatzimakis [2003] FCAFC 4 cited Minister of Justice v Burns and Rafay [2001] 1 SCR 283 discussed Mohamed v President of Republic of South Africa 2001 (3) SA 893 (CC); 2001 (7) BCLR 685 (CC) cited R (Al-Fawwaz) v Governor of Brixton Prison [2002] 1 AC 556 followed R v Governor of Pentonville Prison [1993] 1 WLR 1294; [1993] 3 All ER 504 followed R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; Ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42 cited R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex Parte Johnson [1999] QB 1174 applied Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162 CLR 514 cited Republic of Argentina v Mellino [1987] 1 SCR 536 applied Royal Government of Greece v Governor of Brixton Prison [1971] AC 250 applied S v Makwanyane 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC); 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC) cited Soering v United Kingdom 161 Eur Ct HR (ser A) (1989); (1989) 11 EHRR 439; 28 ILM 1063 (1989) discussed Sun Lau v State of Australia [1999] BCJ No 2971 applied Timar v Republic of Hungary [1999] FCA 1518 cited Venezia v Ministero di Grazia e Giustizia 79 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 815 (1996), (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law 727 cited Wiest v DPP (1988) 23 FCR 472 applied Zachariassen v Commonwealth (1917) 24 CLR 166 applied MICHAEL McCREA v MINISTER FOR CUSTOMS & JUSTICE V851 of 2003 NORTH J 6 OCTOBER 2004 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate