Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Migration Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 1304 TEJINDER SINGH v MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL and MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS No Q 25 of 2004 SPENDER J BRISBANE 11 OCTOBER 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 25 OF 2004
BETWEEN: TEJINDER SINGH
APPLICANT
AND: MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 OCTOBER 2004
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: (1) The respondent pay the costs of the applicant thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004. (2) The applicant otherwise pay the costs of the respondent of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 25 OF 2004
BETWEEN: TEJINDER SINGH
APPLICANT
AND: MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2004
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 I gave judgment in this matter on 25 August 2004, and I then indicated that I would hear the parties on the costs. 2 The parties have submitted written submissions. Those submissions accord with the tentative view I expressed on 25 August 2004. 3 I therefore order that: (a) The respondent pay the costs of the applicant thrown away by the adjournment on 5 May 2004. (b) The applicant otherwise pay the costs of the respondent of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate