Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1308 MIGRATION – procedural fairness – relationship to s 357A of the Act – construction of s 357A – application of procedural fairness provisions – whether denial of procedural fairness at common law – Tribunal affirmed decision cancelling applicant's visa because business sponsor did not comply with undertakings – Tribunal and applicant unaware that delegate had already approved another business sponsor MIGRATION – s 349 – a source of power not of jurisdiction MIGRATION – failure to take account of relevant consideration– whether Tribunal fixed with constructive knowledge of Minister's approval decision – whether Tribunal had duty to inquire – whether approval decision was a relevant consideration MIGRATION – erroneous assumption of fact – whether error went to jurisdiction Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 33(1) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 48, 82(2), 116(1)(g), 348, 349, 351, 352(4), 353, 357A, 359C(2), 360, 363(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Regs 2.43(1)(l)(i), 457.223(4), 457.6, Sch 8 con 8107 Applicants S487/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1309 applied Applicant P40/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 936 applied SHJB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 303 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 applied Re Ruddock; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 cited Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs, unreported, FCA 6 May 1997 cited NAXN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 221 cited NAQF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 130 FCR 456 cited WAJR v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 204 ALR 624 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 cited Moldrich v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1010 cited Comcare v Burton (1998) 157 ALR 522 applied Hospital Benefit Fund of Western Australia Inc v Minister for Health, Housing and Community Services (1992) 39 FCR 225 cited WAIJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 74 cited Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 applied Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 211 CLR 441 applied Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Secretary of State for Education & Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014 cited R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board; Ex parte A [1999] 2 AC 330 cited R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2003] 2 AC 295 cited Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 cited Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte S20/2002 (2003) 198 ALR 59 applied Aronson & Dyer, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, (3rd ed 2004)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate