Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicants M1015/2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1309
MIGRATION – application for protection visa – applicant provided material to Tribunal suggesting all Tamils at risk of persecution in Colombo – Tribunal relied upon country information with differing view – applicant not given copy of country information during proceeding before Tribunal – whether Tribunal failed to accord procedural fairness – whether Tribunal has general obligation to provide applicant with all adverse information relied upon in decision – whether denial of procedural fairness of no consequence on basis that nothing applicant could have said could have made any difference – whether applicant required to demonstrate practical unfairness – whether applicant required to identify what he or she would have said had applicant been told Tribunal intended to rely upon adverse information Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601 referred to Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 applied NARV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 494 applied Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte "A" (2001) 185 ALR 489 considered SBBS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 194 ALR 749 considered Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cassim (2000) 175 ALR 209 referred to Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 referred to NAXX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2002) 119 FCR 312 referred to Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 considered Applicant M115 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1448 referred to NAHI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 referred to VHAP of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 82 referred to VWBS v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 464 referred to Ayan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 139 referred to Dagli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 298 applied Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 at 629 referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 at 122 applied Tuncok v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1069 considered WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 77 ALD 1 referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v NAMW [2004] FCAFC 264 discussed NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 127 FCR 259 discussed Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 (2003) 201 ALR 437 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate