Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant A219/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 1311
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – remitter of application for constitutional writs in High Court – application outside time limited by High Court Rules – whether time limit imposed by High Court Rules applies in proceedings remitted to Federal Court – whether extension of time required Federal Court Rules High Court Rules O 55 r 17, O 55 r 30, O 60 r 6 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601 referred to Re Commonwealth of Australia; Ex parte Marks (2000) 177 ALR 491 cited Applicant M216/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 931 cited Das v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2004) 208 ALR 229 cited S58 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 451 cited M206 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 24 cited Daniel v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 205 ALR 198 cited Applicant S70 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 204 ALR 115 cited Applicant VUAD of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1331 cited Applicant M29 of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1266 cited M162 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1146 cited Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1054 cited Hassen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1036 cited Applicant A16 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 567 cited Applicant A2 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 576 cited Re Ross; Ex parte The Australian Liquor, Hospitality & Miscellaneous Workers' Union (2001) 108 FCR 399 cited P33 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 474 approved Applicant S422 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 89 cited Applicant A184 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1076 cited Applicant S61 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal (2004) 206 ALR 461 cited M211 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 660 cited NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 317 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 211 CLR 441 cited The King v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Ozone Theatres (Aust) Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 389 applied Aronson, Dyer and Groves, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (3rd ed, 2004)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate