Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Limited [2004] FCA 1330
INSURANCE – policies of indemnity insurance – applicant licensed securities dealer – negligent investments made by "securities representatives" under the Corporations Law – settlements made by applicant with investors while liability to indemnify still reserved by respondent insurer and before any breach of policies – whether respondent liable under policies – whether applicant required to prove its legal liability to investors by admissible evidence – whether doctrines of estoppel or waiver available to applicant – whether respondent engaged in unconscionable conduct or misleading and deceptive conduct or breached obligation of utmost good faith – whether applicant liable to investors under s 819(2) of the Law – whether insured would have had a defence to claims by investors under s 819(4) of the Law – settlements made under pressure from Australian Securities and Investments Commission – whether settlements reasonable – whether claims within terms of policies – whether liability under policies for applicant's investigation and legal costs WORDS AND PHRASES – "civil liability claims" – "insured professional business practice" – "prudent uninsured"
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12CA, 12DA 12DB(1)(g) Corporations Law ss 94, 817, 819, 820 Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) s 13
Post Office v Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd [1967] 2 QB 363 at 374 cited Brice v J H Wakerbarth (Australasia) Pty Ltd [1974] 2 Lloyd's Rep 274 at 276 cited Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Limited v Rocco Pezzano Pty Limited (1998) 193 CLR 603 applied Edwards v Insurance Office of Australia Ltd (1933) 34 SR (NSW) 88 applied Parker v Lewis (1873) LR 8 Ch App 1035 applied The Distillers Company Bio-Chemicals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Ajax Insurance Co Ltd (1974) 130 CLR 1 applied General Omnibus Company Ltd v London General Insurance Co Ltd [1936] IR 596 cited Hurlock v Council of the Shire of Johnstone [2002] QCA 256 not followed C E Heath Underwriting & Insurance (Australia) Pty Ltd v Campbell Wallis Moule & Co Pty Ltd [1992] 1 VR 386 distinguished Nigel Watts Fashion Agencies Pty Limited v GIO General Limited (1995) 8 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-235 distinguished ACN 007 838 584 Pty Ltd v Zurich Australian Insurance Ltd (1997) 69 SASR 374 distinguished Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 at 428-429 cited Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 at 441-442 cited New Zealand Pelt Export Co Ltd v Trade Indemnity New Zealand Ltd [2004] VSCA 163 at [96] – [99] cited Sargent v ASL Developments Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 634 at 642 applied Craine v Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 305 at 326 applied Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 197 ALR 153 applied CIC Insurance Ltd v Barwon Region Water Authority [1939] 1 VR 683 at 699 cited Newman v Financial Wisdom Ltd [2004] VSC 216 at [208] applied Lloyd v Grace, Smith & Co [1912] AC 716 cited Polkinghorne v Holland (1934) 51 CLR 143 cited Capricorn Financial Planners Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (1999) 31 ACSR 46 cited CA & MEC McInally Nominees Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2001) 188 ALR 439 at [64] cited Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 78 ALJR 1045 at [22] cited Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] AC 452 at 506 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate