Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1461
COSTS – costs of contested copyright proceedings and related commercial issues – two respondents one of whom alone cross-claimant for copyright relief – issues resolved in favour of applicant for relief and respondent to cross-claim – whether adverse costs orders should be made against both respondents despite one only cross-claiming for copyright relief – Calderbank offer earlier made by applicant – respondents' response to Calderbank offer by form of extravagant monetary demand – costs orders made against both respondents – indemnity costs to apply from time of extravagant response to Calderbank offer CONCRETE PTY LIMITED v PARRAMATTA DESIGN & DEVELOPMENTS PTY LIMITED AND GHASSAN FARES N 1509 OF 2003 CONTI J 12 NOVEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1509 OF 2003
BETWEEN: CONCRETE PTY LTD
APPLICANT
AND: PARRAMATTA DESIGN & DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD
FIRST RESPONDENT
GHASSAN FARES
SECOND RESPONDENT
PARRAMATTA DESIGN & DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD
CROSS-CLAIMANT
CONCRETE PTY LTD
CROSS RESPONDENT JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 NOVEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
1. The applicant has not infringed any copyright of the first and/or second respondents in the architectural plans that accompanied Development Application No. 16-2000-103-1 to Port Stephens Council in respect of the property known as number 5 Laman Street Nelson Bay in the State of New South Wales or in any earlier architectural plans lodged with that Council.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The respondents pay the costs of the applicant up to and including 18 March 2004 (being the expiry date of Concrete's Calderbank offer) inclusive of all interlocutory proceedings within that period of time, on a party and party basis. 2. The respondents pay the costs of the applicant of the proceedings thereafter, inclusive of all interlocutory proceedings within that period of time, on an indemnity basis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate