SZDCJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1500

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZDCJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1500

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – obligation to give written reasons – whether transcript sufficient to constitute written reasons – power to order that no further application be accepted for filing except with the leave of the court.

Federal Court Act 1976 (Cth), s 23 Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth), ss15, 81 Federal Court Rules, Order 46 rule 7A Federal Magistrate Court Rules, rule 2.06

Public Service Board v Osmond (1985) 159 CLR 656 applied House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 cited Pettitt v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 at 388 referred to Housing Commission (NSW) v Tatmar Pastoral Company [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 referred to Wiki v Atlantis Relocations Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 174 referred to Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 referred to Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 cited Archibald v Byron Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 311 referred to Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 referred to SZCTT v MIMIA [2004] FMCA 498 cited Tavalu v MIMIA [2003] FMCA 175 cited Kosi v MIMIA [2003] FMCA 340 cited S515 of 2003 v MIMIA [2004] FCA 501 referred to Re Horvath and Anor; Ex parte Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1998] 1431 referred to David James Roderick v Australian and Overseas Telecommunications Corporation Limited [1997] FCA 325 cited Bird v Free (1994) 126 ALR 475 cited Bizuneh v MIMIA (2003) 128 FCR 353 cited Jones v Skyring (1992) 66 ALJR 810 referred to Westsub Discounts Pty Ltd v IDAPS Australia Ltd (No. 2) (1990) 94 ALR 310 referred to SZDCJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs N 1241 of 2004 JACOBSON J 16 NOVEMBER 2004 SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1241 OF 2004