Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited v Kopystop Pty Limited [2004] FCA 1518 ADDISON WESLEY LONGMAN AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & ORS v KOPYSTOP PTY LIMITED & ORS N 1722 OF 2004 STONE J 22 NOVEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1722 OF 2004
BETWEEN: ADDISON WESLEY LONGMAN AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
FIRST APPLICANT
ALLEN & UNWIN PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
ROBYN ZEVENBERGEN
THIRD APPLICANT
ROBERT WRIGHT
FOURTH APPLICANT
SHELLEY DOLE
FIFTH APPLICANT
AND: KOPYSTOP PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
ARTHUR TCHETCHENIAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
ZAVEN TCHETCHENIAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
MARY TCHETCHENIAN
FOURTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 NOVEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1722 OF 2004
BETWEEN: ADDISON WESLEY LONGMAN AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
FIRST APPLICANT
ALLEN & UNWIN PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
ROBYN ZEVENBERGEN
THIRD APPLICANT
ROBERT WRIGHT
FOURTH APPLICANT
SHELLEY DOLE
FIFTH APPLICANT
AND: KOPYSTOP PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
ARTHUR TCHETCHENIAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
ZAVEN TCHETCHENIAN
THIRD RESPONDENT
MARY TCHETCHENIAN
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 22 NOVEMBER 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate