Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oreb v Willcock [2004] FCA 1520 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Professional Services Review Scheme - whether a medical practitioner has engaged in "inappropriate practice" in connection with the rendering or initiation of services for which Medicare benefits are payable – investigative referral – adjudicative referral – referral period - "prescribed pattern of services" – breach of the 80/20 rule – exceptional circumstances – s 92 Agreement Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – s 11(3) Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) - Part VAA – ss 80, 81, 82, 92, 93, 93A, 94, 106KA, 106T, 106U Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A) Health Insurance (Professional Services Review) Regulations 1999 (Cth) – Regs 10, 11 Abernethy v Deitz (1996) 39 NSWLR 701 referred to Boscolo v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1999) 90 FCR 531 referred to Braganza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 170 referred to Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 referred to Commercial Union Assurance Co of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 referred to Crowley v Holmes [2004] FCA 521 considered and applied Daniel v Kelly (2003) 200 ALR 379 distinguished Elias v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 123 FCR 499 referred to Freeman v Health Insurance Commission [2004] FCA 453 applied Health Insurance Commission v Grey (2002) 120 FCR 470 referred to Institute of Patent Agents v Lockwood [1894] AC 347 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 referred to Kelly v Daniel [2004] FCAFC 14 distinguished Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 291 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1985) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v State of Western Australia (1996) 67 FCR 40 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai (2001) 106 FCR 426 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited MLC Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2004) 205 ALR 207 referred to Peko-Wallsend Ltd v Minister for Aboriginal Affairs (1985) 5 FCR 532 referred to Pradhan v Holmes (2001) 125 FCR 280 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 cited Pearce & Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (5th ed) at [3.38] J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence (7th Aust ed) at [1215]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate