Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hatcher v Cohn [2004] FCA 1548 HEALTH LAW – medical practitioner – review of conduct in rendering services to patients over period of time – Professional Services Review Scheme under Part VAA of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) – investigative referral made by Health Insurance Commission to Director of Professional Services Review – adjudicative referral made by Director of Professional Services Review to Professional Services Review Committee – final report provided by Committee to Determining Authority – directions made by Determining Authority – whether there were matters which the Commission was obliged to take into account in considering whether to refer the matter for investigation – meaning of "exceptional circumstances" in s 106KA(2) – whether Committee erred in its opinion that "exceptional circumstances" in s 106KA(2) generally refers to intermittent or episodic situations and not ongoing situations or those of long-standing – whether Committee erred in its opinion that "exceptional circumstances" does not refer to matters which are within a practitioner's control – failure by Committee to identify the correct question about the nature of the medical shortages put forward by the applicant as constituting exceptional circumstances – failure by Committee to apply reg 11(b) of the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review) Regulations 1999 in its own terms – whether Determining Authority had jurisdiction to make direction for repayment under s 106U(1) Statutes Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) Part VAA, s 106KA, s 80(1), s 86(1), s 81, s 86(2), s 86, s 88, s 89, s 91, s 93(1), s 93(6), s 101(2), s 106KD, s 106L, s 106U, s 106T, s 106TA, s 106U(1), s 82(1), s 106KA(5), s 106KA(2), s 106KA(1), s 106U(1)(ca) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A) Cases Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Baker v R (2004) 78 ALJR 1483 considered Craig, Williamson Proprietary Limited v Barrowcliff [1915] VLR 450 cited Day & Dent Constructions Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v North Australian Properties Pty Ltd (Provisional Liquidator Appointed) (1982) 150 CLR 85 cited Kelly v Daniel [2004] FCAFC 14 distinguished Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 considered United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate