Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mastipour v Secretary, Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1571
MIGRATION- removal of non citizens – claim for damages for alleged breaches of duties of care whilst in immigration detention before this Court – application for interlocutory orders preventing applicant being removed from Australia pursuant to s 198(6) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) until the hearing and determination of these proceedings – whether Court has power to make such an order – Court's power to prevent frustration of its processes – whether civil proceedings justifies restraining removal
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution s 75(v) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 5(9), 189, 198(6), 474, 475A Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B, 44 Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Mastipour v Secretary, Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 952 cited M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 131 FCR 146 cited Rahmani v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 125 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri (2003) 126 FCR 54 cited Lewai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1309 cited Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612 cited Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1 cited Williams v Minister for the Environment & Heritage (2003) 199 ALR 352; [2003] FCA 627 cited Tait v The Queen (1962) 108 CLR 620 cited Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1414 cited He v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs[2001] FCA 1368 cited Li v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 667 cited P1/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1029 cited P1/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1370 cited NAEX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1633 cited Ex parte De Braic (1971) 124 CLR 162 cited Edualino v Pilliod 309 F2d 294 (1962) cited Attorney-General (NSW) v Ray (1989) 90 ALR 263 cited Ex parte Abebe [1998] HCA 10 cited NATB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 185 cited WACM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1534 cited MZUAZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1390 cited SRFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1021 cited Khan v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 41 FCR 432 cited Tchoylak v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 111 FCR 302 cited Kopiev v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1831 applied Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 cited K Mason QC, 'The Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court', Australian Law Journal, vol 57, August 1983, p 449-459 MOHAMMED AMIN MASTIPOUR v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS, AUSTRALIAN CORRECTIONAL MANAGEMENT PTY LTD & THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SAD 602 OF 2003 MANSFIELD J 3 DECEMBER 2004 ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate