Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v The IMB Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2004] FCA 1592 COSTS – specified costs without taxation – litigants in person – whether acting as agents – whether entitled to recover monies for work in preparation of and presentation of defence or appeal – whether entitled to recover out of pocket expenses
Corporation Law s 601AD(1) Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403 followed Cachia v Hanes (1991) 23 NSWLR 304 considered Cachia v Isaacs (1989) NSWCA BC8902724 cited AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION V THE IMB GROUP PTY LTD (In Liquidation), LOGAN LIONS LIMITED (In Liquidation), SAMSON NEALE BACKO, DAVID JOHN IVERS, LUKE VINCENT IVERS, JOHN LINSAY IVERS, LANCE THOMAS STONE, MICHAEL JOHN McLEAN, WILLIAM ANTHONY MUSGRAVE, ROBERT CROWLEY, GLENN JAMES IVERS QG175 OF 1993 KIEFEL J BRISBANE 3 DECEMBER 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG175 OF 1993
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: THE IMB GROUP PTY LTD (In Liquidation) (ACN 050 411 946)
FIRST RESPONDENT
LOGAN LIONS LIMITED (In Liquidation) (ACN 060 338 758)
THIRD RESPONDENT
SAMSON NEALE BACKO
FOURTH RESPONDENT
DAVID JOHN IVERS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
LUKE VINCENT IVERS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
JOHN LINSAY IVERS
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
LANCE THOMAS STONE
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL JOHN McLEAN
NINTH RESPONDENT
WILLIAM ANTHONY MUSGRAVE
TENTH RESPONDENT
ROBERT COWLEY
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
GLENN JAMES IVERS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate