Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZATG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1595 MIGRATION – jurisdictional error – procedural fairness – claimedfailure of RRT's duty of enquiry to verify authenticity of foreign official documents – no evidentiary basis established for claim – claim incapable of succeeding – additional claim that RRT's adverse findings not supported by positive evidence – RRT not required to provide positive evidence to support findings adverse to appellant's claims – appeal dismissed Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 418(3), 420, 424A(1), 424A(2), 424A(3), 424(3)(b), 427(1)(d)
Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 applied Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 cited Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 applied Htun v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 cited Jagjit Singh v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 42 ALD 271 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Ethnic Affairs v Surjit Singh (1997) 74 FCR 553 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v NAMW [2004] FCAFC 264considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SGLB (2004) 78 ALJR 992 applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 considered Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601 cited NAHV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 214 cited NANF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 292 cited NAOA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 241 cited NARV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 133 FCR 89 considered Prasad v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 cited Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 applied Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 (2003) 77 ALJR 1909 applied Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Cassim (2000) 175 ALR 209 considered Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 206 CLR 57 applied Somaghi v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1991) 31 FCR 100 applied Sun Zhan Qui v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1997] FCA 324 (unreported, Lindgren J, 6 May 1997) cited Surjit Singh v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1996) 42 ALD 504 cited SZATG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs[2004] FMCA 476 affirmed VAF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 206 ALR 471 applied WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 131 FCR 511 considered WAGJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 277 considered SZATG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS NSD 1132 OF 2004 HELY J 8 DECEMBER 2004 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate