Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Australian Video Retailers Association Limited[2004] FCA 1613 TRADE PRACTICES – one party provider of pay television services – other party corporate representative of DVD/video store proprietors whereof the latter are members – introduction of new digital technology for pay television and its implications in terms of comparative advertising of the litigants – opposing claims of misleading and deceptive conduct by way of promotional material claims – modern advertising techniques including websites – implications of each conflicting party's promotional materials – appropriate remedies for respective litigating parties – remedies granted in favour of both litigating parties Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53(c), 53(e) and 163A Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661 referred to Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216 referred to Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 referred to Puxu Pty Ltd v Parkdale Custom Furniture Pty Ltd (1980) 31 ALR 73 referred to Heidelberg Graphics Equipment Limited v Andrew Knox & Associates Pty Limited and Others (1994) ATPR 41-326 referred to Taco Company of Australian Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 referred to Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd (2002) 53 IPR 481 referred to Telstra Corporation Limited v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (1996) 36 IPR 515 referred to Equity Access Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1990) 16 IPR 431 referred to Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 referred to Campomar Sociedad Limitado v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 applied Sterling Winthrop Pty Ltd v R & C Products Pty Ltd (1994) ATPR 41-308 referred to Lumley Life Ltd v Independent Order of Odd Fellows of Victoria Friendly Society (1989) 16 IPR 316 referred to Duracell Australia Pty Ltd v Union Carbide Australia Ltd (1988) 14 IPR 293 referred to Hoover (Aust) Pty Ltd v Email Ltd (1991) 104 ALR 369 referred to Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v The South Australian Brewery Co Ltd (1996) 66 FCR 451 referred to Truth About Motorways Pty Limited v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited (1999) 200 CLR 591 applied Stuart Alexander & Co (Interstate) Pty Ltd v Blenders Pty Ltd (1981) 37 ALR 161 referred to Colgate Palmolive Pty Ltd v Rexona Pty Ltd (1982) 58 FLR 391 referred to referred to Gillette Australia Pty Ltd v Energizer Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 193 ALR 629 referred to FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED v AUSTRALIAN VIDEO RETAILERS ASSOCIATION LIMITED, AUSTRALIAN VIDEO RETAILERS ASSOCIATION LIMITED AND FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED N 1054 OF 2004 CONTI J 8 DECEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate