Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tax Agents' Board v Bray [2004] FCA 1620
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ('AAT') failed to correctly apply test stated in s 251JC of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – fair reading of the AAT's reasons indicate that the Tribunal was aware of and applied the correct test – complaint amounted to assertion that the AAT came to incorrect conclusion – no error of law established ADMINISTRATIVE LAW– irrelevant considerations – the AAT's reasons made reference to matters irrelevant to question before the Tribunal – reference not part of the AAT's reasoning process – no reviewable error established – application dismissed
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 251JA, 251JA(1), 251BC, 251JB, 251JC, 251JC(1), 251JC(2), 251JG(2), 251L, 251N Avon Downes Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Zoffanies Pty Ltd (2003) 132 FCR 52 applied Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 applied Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 considered R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100 considered Sinclair v Mining Warden at Maryborough (1975) 132 CLR 473 applied TAX AGENTS' BOARD v STEPHEN BRAY NSD 995 OF 2004 HELY J 10 DECEMBER 2004 SYDNEY (HEARD IN CANBERRA)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 995 OF 2004
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: TAX AGENTS' BOARD
APPELLANT
AND: STEPHEN BRAY
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HELY J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN CANBERRA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate