Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paperlinx Limited v Skidmore [2004] FCA 1624 CORPORATIONS – statutory demand – presumption of insolvency – rebuttable – company solvent – improper purpose
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459A, 459C(2)(a), 459C(3), 459J(1)(b) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 995-1 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 12-85, 16-20, 16-70
Atlas Tiles Limited v Briers (1976) 144 CLR 202 cited Bowes v The Directors of the Hope Life Insurance and Guarantee Company (1865) 11 HLC 389 cited Cadiz Water Works Company v Barnett (1874) 19 LR Eq 182 cited Commissioner of State Revenue of Victoria v The Roy Morgan Research Centre Pty Ltd (1997) 24 ACSR 73 approved Cullen v Trappell (1980) 146 CLR 1 cited David Grant & Co Pty Limited (Receiver Appointed) v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 referred to Fortuna Holdings Pty Ltd v The Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [1978] VR 83 cited K.C Parksafe (Vic) Pty Ltd v Dallbrook Pty Ltd (1998) 87 FCR 509 distinguished Mann v Goldstein [1968] 1 WLR 1091 cited Masters Paving Pty Ltd v Heading Contractors Pty Ltd (1997) 15 ACLC 1025 approved Wheeler v Philip Morris Limited (1989) 32 IR 323 cited William Hockley Ltd, In re [1962] 1 WLR 555 cited PAPERLINX LIMITED V PAUL SKIDMORE V1022 of 2004 FINKELSTEIN J MELBOURNE 10 DECEMBER 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1022 of 2004
BETWEEN: PAPERLINX LIMITED
Plaintiff
AND: PAUL SKIDMORE
Defendant
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate