Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Inglewood Olive Processors Limited v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2004] FCA 1659 CUSTOMS AND EXCISE – Customs Act 1901 (Cth) – countervailable duty – application for review of decision of the Trade Measures Review Officer – termination of investigation under s 269TDA(2)(b)(i) – whether Chief Executive Officer of Customs empowered to consider 'benefit' under s 269TACC(3) – roles of CEO of Customs and Minister under Part XVB – whether CEO of Customs and Trade Measures Review Officer misconceived the approach to s 269TDA(2)(b)(i) – whether decisions of CEO of Customs and Trade Measures Review Officer unreasonable
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5(1) Customs Act 1901 (Cth), ss 269T, 269TAAC, 269TACC, 269TB, 269TBA, 269TC, 269TD, 269TDA, 269TDAA, 269TE, 269TEA, 269TF, 269ZZ, 269ZZN, 269ZZR, 269ZZT, 269ZZV Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B(1)
Pilkington (Australia) Pty Ltd v Minister for Justice and Customs [2002] FCA 770 referred to INGLEWOOD OLIVE PROCESSORS LIMITED v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CUSTOMS & ANOR N 1363 OF 2004 STONE J 15 DECEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1363 OF 2004
BETWEEN: INGLEWOOD OLIVE PROCESSORS LIMITED
APPLICANT
AND: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CUSTOMS
FIRST RESPONDENT
TRADE MEASURES REVIEW OFFICER
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1363 OF 2004
BETWEEN: INGLEWOOD OLIVE PROCESSORS LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate