Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wade v Secretary, Department of Family & Community Services [2004] FCA 1660 SOCIAL WELFARE – apportionment of shared care of children – eligibility for the Family Tax Benefit – calculation of the Family Tax Benefit – means by which the calculation of shared care should be made – whether hours should not be used in calculating care for the purposes of the Family Tax Benefit – use of Family Assistance Guide in determining how the percentage of Family Tax Benefit for a child is to be determined - pattern of care
Statutes A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act 1999 (Cth) ss 21, 22, 58, 59(1), Part 3, 22(7), 25, 25(2), 25(3), 58(1), 58(3), 59 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1)
Cases Re Harrison and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (2002) 68 ALD 543 Refd to Re Nowicz and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (2001) 65 ALD 314 Refd to PAUL WADE v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES and LINLEY BARAN Q76 OF 2004 KIEFEL J 20 DECEMBER 2004 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q76 OF 2004
BETWEEN: PAUL WADE
APPLICANT
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
FIRST RESPONDENT
LINLEY BARAN
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KIEFEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs including any reserved costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q76 OF 2004
BETWEEN: PAUL WADE
APPLICANT
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate