Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Watt v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1669 Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) ss 4, 7, 7A, 7C, 19A, 20, 22, 24A, 28, 29, 30, 30(4), 30(5), 46B Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 264 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 8C, 8D Criminal Property Forfeiture Act (NT) s 12, 43, 49, 64, 73, 136
Mansfield v Australian Crime Commission (2003) 132 FCR 251; [2003] FCA 1059 cited Sorby v The Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 cited Hamilton v Orders (1989) 166 CLR 486 cited A v Boulton (2004) 207 ALR 342; [2004] FCAFC 101 cited A v Boulton (2004) 204 ALR 598; [2004] FCA 56 cited Hak Song Ra v ACC [2004] FCA 416 cited Loprete v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1476 cited X v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1475 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v De Vonk (1995) 61 FCR 564 cited Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54 cited Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1986) 161 CLR 148 cited Barnes v Boulton [2004] FCA 1219 cited GARY WILLIAM WATT v AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION NTD 25 of 2004 MANSFIELD J 15 DECEMBER 2004 DARWIN (HEARD IN ADELAIDE VIA TELEPHONE LINK)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY NTD 25 OF 2004
BETWEEN: GARY WILLIAM WATT
APPLICANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN CRIME COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: DARWIN (HEARD IN ADELAIDE VIA TELEPHONE LINK)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for interlocutory relief be refused. 2. Costs of the application for interlocutory relief be reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY NTD 25 OF 2004
BETWEEN: GARY WILLIAM WATT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate