SZAYI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1724
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZAYI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1724
SZAYI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 1719 of 2004
HILL J
17 DECEMBER 2004
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1719 OF 2004
BETWEEN: SZAYI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 DECEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court of Australia Act.
2. The appellant pay the costs of the respondent Minister.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1719 OF 2004
BETWEEN: SZAYI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE: 17 DECEMBER 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HILL J:
1 Before the Court is an appeal from a Federal Magistrate dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal refusing the granting of a protection visa.
2 The appeal to this court was lodged by the appellant on 22 November 2004. The appeal was listed for a directions hearing before me this morning. The appellant did not attend the directions hearing although the notice of appeal clearly set out the time and date of the hearing and he was advised that if he did not attend orders could be made in his absence.
3 The appellant did not attend the hearing. Accordingly, at the request of the respondent Minister I would order that the appeal be dismissed. In so doing I exercise the power referred to in section 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court of Australia Act. The appeal is accordingly dismissed and I order the appellant to pay the respondent Minister's costs of it.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hill.
Associate:
Dated: 19 January 2005
No appearance for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent: J Bautista
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore
Date of Hearing: 17 December 2004
Date of Judgment: 17 December 2004
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.