Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Checked-Out Pty Limited v Eagle Eye Inspections Pty Limited [2004] FCA 1759 CHECKED-OUT PTY LIMITED v EAGLE EYE INSPECTIONS PTY LIMITED & ORS N169 OF 1999 EMMETT J 2 SEPTEMBER 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N169 OF 1999
BETWEEN: CHECKED-OUT PTY LIMITED (ACN 071 965 798)
APPLICANT
AND: EAGLE EYE INSPECTIONS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 084 722 234)
FIRST RESPONDENT
JOSEPH WILLIAMS
SECOND RESPONDENT
WAYNE THOMAS COOK
THIRD RESPONDENT
TIMOTHY BOLLINS
FOURTH RESPONDENT
DEBORAH JEAN WILLIAMS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
PETER ADAMS trading as PETER ADAMS, SOLICITORS & ATTORNEYS
SIXTH RESPONDENT
KATARINA MUC trading as G H HEALEY & CO BLACKTOWN and BRUCE McCANN trading as
B E McCANN & CO SOLICITORS
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
MARK KELADA trading as MARK KELADA SOLICITORS
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL QUINN trading as QUINNS SOLICITORS
NINTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL JOHN NOYCE and GREGORY LAURENCE MARTIN trading as NOYCE LAWYERS
TENTH RESPONDENT
HENRY GRECH trading as GRECH PARTNERS SOLICITORS
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
GREGORY PETER GUY trading as GUY & ASSOCIATES SOLICITORS
TWELFTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 2 SEPTEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1. ORDERS that the notices of motion of the second to fifth respondents and of the sixth to eleventh respondents, both filed on 23 August 2004, be dismissed insofar as they relate to second and third named respondents of the motion, Ms Patricia Lane and Mr Paul Solomon. 2. ORDERS that the applicants on the motions (being the second to fifth respondents and the sixth to eleventh respondents) pay Ms Lane's and Mr Solomon's costs of the motions. 3. GRANTS LEAVE to the second and third named respondents to the motions to have a bill of costs taxed and paid forthwith. 4. DIRECTS the applicant to file and serve no later than 16 September 2004 a draft of any proposed amended statement of claim. 5. STANDS OVER the motions and lists the matter generally for directions on 24 September 2004 at 9.30 am. 6. DIRECTS that the solicitors for the sixth to eleventh respondent file on or before 5 pm on 6 September 2004 an affidavit explaining why those respondents' costs of the mediation of 24 September 2003 have not been paid. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate