Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nauru Phosphate Royalties Trust v Business Australia Capital Mortgage Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1782 NAURU PHOSPHATE ROYALTIES TRUST & ORS v BUSINESS AUSTRALIA CAPITAL MORTGAGE PTY LIMITED & ORS N1159 OF 2004 EMMETT J 12 AUGUST 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1159 OF 2004
BETWEEN: NAURU PHOSPHATE ROYALTIES TRUST
FIRST APPLICANT
REPUBLIC OF NAURU FINANCE CORPORATION
SECOND APPLICANT
RANDWICK NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
THIRD APPLICANT
CENTRAL PACIFIC (DOWNTOWNER) PTY LIMITED
FOURTH APPLICANT
SPENCER INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED
FIFTH APPLICANT
RONSI BUSINESS PTY LIMITED
SIXTH APPLICANT
RONSI HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
SEVENTH APPLICANT
AND: BUSINESS AUSTRALIA CAPITAL MORTGAGE PTY LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
BUSINESS AUSTRALIA CAPITAL FINANCE PTY LIMITED
SECOND RESPONDENT
HLBC PTY LIMITED
THIRD RESPONDENT
IAN DAVID ROGUT (AKA IAN DAVID LAZAR)
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 AUGUST 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS: 1. The challenge to the retainer of the legal representatives of the first and the third to seventh applicants be dismissed.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1159 OF 2004
BETWEEN: NAURU PHOSPHATE ROYALTIES TRUST
FIRST APPLICANT
REPUBLIC OF NAURU FINANCE CORPORATION
SECOND APPLICANT
RANDWICK NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate