Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Automotive, Foods, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union v Eaton Electrical Systems Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 2 AUTOMOTIVE, FOODS, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING & KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION v EATON ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PTY LTD NSD1979 OF 2004 MOORE J 7 JANUARY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD1979 OF 2004
BETWEEN: AUTOMOTIVE, FOODS, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING & KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION
APPLICANT
AND: EATON ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS PTY LTD
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 JANUARY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT NOTES THATthe applicant by its counsel undertakes to the Court: (a) to submit to such order (if any) as the Court may consider to be just for the payment of compensation, to be assessed by the Court or as it may direct, to any person, whether or not a party, adversely affected by the operation of this interlocutory order or any continuation (with or without variation) thereof; and (b) to pay the compensation referred to in (a) to the person there referred to. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. If, within seven days, any person listed in Schedule A states in writing to the respondent that he is willing: (a) to become an employee of the respondent pending the hearing and determination of this proceeding or further order; and (b) to accept the obligations attaching to him as such an employee, the respondent, by itself, its servants and agents, thereafter until the hearing and determination of this proceeding or further order employ any such person on terms and conditions of employment no less favourable than those afforded to him immediately prior to the termination of his employment on 22 December 2004. 2. In the event that the Court makes a final order in this proceeding without ordering that any such person be reinstated in his employment with the respondent, unless the Court otherwise orders, the employment referred to in order 1 will cease and determine without further act by or on behalf of either the respondent or any such person. 3. Liberty is reserved to either party to apply on forty-eight hours notice in writing to the other party.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate