Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAVZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 13
MIGRATION – alleged persecution by reason of religion – application for review of decision refusing application for protection visa – where applicant was a member of the Church of Scientology in Russia – where applicant claimed mistreatment by officials because he was a Scientologist – whether failure to make findings on material matters amounted to a jurisdictional error – whether Tribunal fundamentally misunderstood legal principle in finding that the 1997 'Law of Religion' in Russia was appropriate and adapted to achieving a legitimate object of the State.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Chen Shi Hai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 201 CLR 293 followed Church of the New Faith v Commissioner for Payroll Tax (1982 – 1983) 154 CLR 120 followed Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 followed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 followed Nagaratnam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 569 referred to Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 94 FCR 28 referred to SCAT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 80 followed WAEE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 WAFP v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 319 cited NAVZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N1465 of 2003 MADGWICK J 21 JANUARY 2005 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1465 of 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate