Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth of Australia [2005] FCA 17 ENVIRONMENT – protection from Commonwealth actions – amendment of arterial roads policy in National Capital Plan – such amendment not an 'action' covered by Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 s 28(1), s 523, s 524(2) Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 (Cth) s 10, 11, 12, 21, 22 Minister for the Environment and Heritage v Queensland Conservation Council Inc [2004] FCAFC 190 referred to SAVE THE RIDGE INC v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR ACD 16 of 2004 WHITLAM J 20 JANUARY 2005 SYDNEY (HEARD AT CANBERRA)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
DISTRICT REGISTRY ACD 16 of 2004
BETWEEN: SAVE THE RIDGE INC
APPLICANT
AND: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WHITLAM J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 JANUARY 2005
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD AT CANBERRA)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The separate questions be answered as follows: (a) Question: Do the activities identified in the particulars set out in paragraph 3 of the grounds of the amended application constitute, individually or collectively, "action" for the purposes of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999? Answer: No.
(b) Question: Do any of the activities identified in paragraph 7 of those grounds, namely:
(i) the making of amendment 41 to the National Capital Plan;
(ii) the making of amendment 46 to the National Capital Plan;
(iii) the granting of works approvals on 6 February 2004, 18 February 2004, 24 February 2004, 17 March 2004 and 18 March 2004;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate