Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kurniadi v Loh [2005] FCA 49
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consolidation of proceedings – thirteen applicants – claims for damages and other relief arising out of marketing of ostrich farm investments – some applicants represented, some unrepresented – represented applicants desire to progress to trial – little progress since consolidation order – deconsolidation order made HERMAN KURNIADI v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 8 of 2004 IWAN SALIM v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 9 of 2004 CHARLES LIAW and HERLINA SALIM v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 10 of 2004 MARIATI T HARDI v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 11 of 2004 SOEDARJANTO v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 12 of 2004 SYLVIA POERWITA v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 13 of 2004 PANTIRATA DIBASA PANGGABEAN v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 14 of 2004 JOHNSON TOBING and SURIANI TAHIR v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 15 of 2004 LELA LAKSANA v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 16 of 2004 OEMAR KRESNO OETOMO v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 17 of 2004 LIONG TEK LUNG v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 18 of 2004 DEWI ANGGRAENI ANGGAWIRJA v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 19 of 2004 RETNO WACHJOEWIDAJAT v SIMON THUANG CHYE LOH, ROBERT ASHMAN, STEPHEN WILLIAM MARSHALL, NEIL HENRY POLLARD and OSTRICH MEAT & MARKETING COMPANY (AUSTRALIA) LTD WAD 20 of 2004 FRENCH J 4 FEBRUARY 2005 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate