Applicants M237/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 95

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Applicants M237/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 95

MIGRATION – application for an order nisi for prohibition – previous applications for judicial review refused – no arguable case made out for the grant of an order nisi

CCC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 682 CCC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1707 Applicants M237/2002 v MIMIA & Anor [2003] FCA 1183 Applicant M237 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 61 APPLICANTS M 237/2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND MR J VRACHNAS SITTING AS THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND MR ADOLFO GENTILE IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL V 162 OF 2003 MERKEL J 18 FEBRUARY 2005 MELBOURNE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V162 OF 2003

BETWEEN: APPLICANTS M237/2002

APPLICANTS

AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

FIRST RESPONDENT

MR J VRACHNAS SITTING AS THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND MR ADOLFO GENTILE IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL

SECOND RESPONDENTS JUDGE: MERKEL J

DATE OF ORDER: 18 FEBRUARY 2005

WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE

THE COURT ORDERS: 1. Pursuant to the Federal Court Rules O 51A r 5(2) that O 51A r 5(1) does not apply to this application. 2. The application for an order nisi for a writ of prohibition is refused. 3. The applicants pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to the application.

Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA